Hello there, my site is at :
EDIT: Link removed, as showing up on google.
Have tested in IE7,6,5.5.
Would appreciated any feedback, good or bad
Two, count 'em two html
Two, count 'em two HTML tags! Great advert for a web design service - NOT!
page is now validated
page is now validated...
also.... this page doesn't seem to be getting picked up by the google spider, whereas some other static pages I have made, namely hypercreative.co.nz/bluewater have worked.
The background of all but
The background of all but the first page I went on took so long to load I thought the page wasn't finished because I couldn't see any of your black text due to it being on a black background. May need some thought as there's people out there with a LOT slower connection than mine.
really....? The biggest
really....? The biggest things in there are scriptilicious libaries and a few tiny gifs...
The server is based in New Zealand...
It's a bit unusable if you
It's a bit unusable if you ask me.
possibly due to invalid
possibly due to invalid code?
Also, why the transitional doctype?
I agree with he statement above, the background images do take a couple seconds to download and I'm on a 5meg connection
with css disabled I don't know where I am... you're company is called 'about us'?
waaaa! Triumph howd you get it to do that?! maybe you viewed it when I was changing it last night to get it to validate?
I have checked it with css disabled and it looks ok....
As for the background images I have put a preload script on now...to stop the title tag showing before the big box..
How come your site looks
How come your site looks just like mootools though?
the bluewater one looks a
the bluewater one looks a bit knacked in FF1.5
you've got css errors and
you've got css errors and you're still using a transistional dtd because?